Patton about Iraq

Friday, May 28, 2010

The Iraqi War

The war on Iraq was declared on March 20th, 2003. The war has begun because of the 9/11 attack that happened on September 11th, 2001. Ever since March, American troops were flown from the United States to catch the ones responsible for the deaths and injuries of thousands. After seven years, the only person that we were able to catch was Osama Bin Laden. There were many groups involved in the bombing, but the main one was Al-Qaeda, with Bin Laden in charge. Since then, we could not find anyone else involved. The question is if that we should leave our troops in Iraq for a longer period, or should we pull them out of there. If we stay, we will lose more troops and more money without accomplishing anything. If we pull our troops out, it will seem like we just sent troops for nothing. So which one seems more reasonable? Which one seems like a safer way? Which one would make it better for everyone around? We should pull out our troops from Iraq because it is horrible knowing that our soldiers have to sit in a foreign country, accomplishing almost nothing. We are losing a lot of men fast, and it is hard to replenish them. I mean, we cannot just get random guys from the street, give them a gun, and drop them off in the heat of battle in Iraq. They have to be trained, which takes money, fed, which takes money, sheltered, which takes money, and geared up, which takes money. Monthly, United States spends around 7.3 BILLION dollars on the War in Iraq. Multiplying that by eighty-four will give you the money we have spent in seven years, give or take three or four billion dollars. All those things are not for free, and we cannot afford anymore losses. If we pull our troops out right now, we might be able to save thousands of lives that would have been lost if we did not give up. So far, we have had more than 5,000 deaths and more than 30,000 wounded soldiers in Iraq. If we keep on fighting and sending in troops, there will be way more casualties then there already is. Even if we keep on sending in troops, we have to think of the casualties that are happening to the opposite side. Just last year, the estimated amount of civilian casualties is between 50,000 to 100,000. Some estimates even go beyond that, stating the numbers as high as 600,000. It is bad for both sides to keep on fighting. The 9/11 incident was nine years ago. Everyone understands that it was a complete disaster, but it is history. We should not fight over something that has happened nine years ago. It is bad for us because we waste all men that have families, friends, wives, children. We also kill men that have all that. We are shooting at people who might have been in a happy marriage for over fifteen years. They may not want to be in this fight, but they were ripped away from their families, given a gun, and made to shoot at the American troops. The war in Iraq might go on, but the losses we have suffered are way too great to forget about.


Word Count: 559

7 comments:

  1. I do agree that the United States needs to get their soldiers out of Iraq, but I do understand why they are still there. They are there to make Iraq a Democratic government. If the U.S. leaves now, another dictator could easily come into power and the U.S. will have to start all their work over again.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe that as a world superpower, it is the USA's responsibility to help other countries. However, if it is absolutely clear that the country, such as Iraq, does not want our help, we should leave them alone. Although, you have to listen to what the people want in Iraq and not what the dictators do, because I believe the first step to establishing democracy somewhere is determining whether or not the people in the said country actually want our help in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I feel that the United States of America shouldn't have even involved the people in a non-ending war in another country. I believe in what Washington said about not involving the U.S. in other countries disputes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I completely agree. Why should our troops have to stay in Iraq losing lives and gaining nothing? I definitely think that the sooner we pull the troops out the better, however, they did find Osama Bin Laden. So we cannot say they did not accomplish nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I completely agree with Shane. Why would we pull out of Iraq now after all we've done and after everything that has happened. I don't really see another dictator coming into picture but you shouldn't quit before you reach your goal.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with you that we should pull our troups out of Iraq. Thousands of men are dying out there for no reason and at all and it is accomplishing nothing. All we are doing is wasting money and lives.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If Iraq does not what our help why are we still helping them?

    ReplyDelete